The sky was turning increasingly dark. Ominous clouds covered everything from horizon to horizon. And then it started – the rain. It rained and it rained and it rained. It seemed that it would never stop as the fields began to get saturated with endless moisture. No one had seen this amount of water before, and it seemed that the world was coming to an end.
No, I’m not describing Indiana, though it certainly sounds like it with all the precipitation we’ve had this spring. Instead I am referring to the most devastating disaster that ever came upon the earth – Noah’s Flood. It’s often referred to that way, though the vast majority of Christians would say that it was God who caused the Flood.
Why would He do that? Why would God cause a worldwide Flood that would destroy every living man, woman, child, and animal except for those on the famous ark?
The answer seems simple when one reads the pages of Scripture. Look at how it’s stated in Genesis 6:5-7.
The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. So the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.”
Clearly the Lord was very troubled by the evil and wickedness of mankind. Who could blame Him? Their thoughts were filled with evil all the time. He was so upset and filled with regret that he was determined to wipe out everyone but Noah’s family.
But why save Noah? What made him special? What made God single him and his family out from the rest of humanity? As the narrative in Genesis tells us, “Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he walked faithfully with God (Genesis 6:9).”
Now the picture is starting to become clearer. What made God so angry with the rest of mankind was not just the fact that they were wicked and evil, but it was what lay at the root of their wickedness that bothered Him so much. Unlike Noah, the rest of humanity was not even close to walking faithfully with God. Mankind’s unfaithfulness had escalated tremendously since the day of Adam and Eve’s fall in the Garden of Eden. And God was ticked! He had watched generation after generation ignore Him and descend further and further into sin. He couldn’t take it anymore and He was out for blood.
Isn’t that the way a lot of us have heard this story? The way it’s told makes God out to be a vindictive, bloodthirsty tyrant. He will get revenge on anyone who doesn’t acknowledge Him and follow Him. And nothing pleases Him more than crushing His enemies.
It’s that view of God that has caused some atheists to reject Christianity. Again and again they ask, “Why would I want to worship a God like that?” But is that what’s really going on in this story? I know that some would say to me, “But God is a just God who must punish sinners. He has the right to judge evil people.” I’m not denying that He has that right; He is sovereign over all His creation and can certainly do that if He desires. I’m just asking, is that what He really desires?
Not according to Scriptures. Ezekiel tells us, “As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign Lord, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live (Ezekiel 33:11).” That’s the true heart of God. His desire is that all people come to Him and live.
If that’s true, then why did God destroy all mankind? Why not spare them and hope they would come around to following Him? I believe the answer lies with how mankind’s evil and wickedness was manifesting itself. As we’re told just a couple verses later, “Now the earth was corrupt in God’s sight and was full of violence (Genesis 6:11).” That last phrase is the key – “full of violence.” Mankind’s wickedness had become so severe that violence was prevalent everywhere.
What if God in His infinite knowledge knew that man’s violence was so awful that they would soon destroy themselves? What if it was so severe that the violence would eventually make it’s way to Noah and his family? What if the only hope for mankind’s future, and the future hope of salvation, was for God to take the extreme action He did in order to save Noah and his family and thereby save a future for humanity? Afterall, if the violence would have ultimately led to the murder of every human being, where would the hope for a future be then?
Seen from this perspective, God’s actions are actually rooted in love. His goal was not to destroy mankind but to save mankind from completely destroying themselves. I’m convinced that He took an action that He didn’t want to take but had to.
Of course, I could be wrong. I’m certainly open to that possibility. But as I have stated in every article since I started this series last month, what we see in Jesus is what we have in God. Jesus and our Father are one. Can you picture Jesus vindictively wiping out humanity because they had rejected Him and were living wicked and evil lives? We’re talking about the one who pleaded for humanity when he said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing (Luke 23:34),” and that was after being brutally beaten, abused, and humiliated by his killers, who, ironically, were perpetrating the same kind of violence that led to the Flood. Only now, instead of killing each other, they were killing the Son of God. And yet he still showed them compassion and love as he was dying an agonizing death on the cross.
So if I’m in error, I prefer to err on the side of love. As John clearly stated, “God is love (1 John 4:8).” Since love is the very core of who God is (and that is certainly what Jesus demonstrated to us all), then everything God does must somehow be rooted in love. So where some see wrath, I see love. And that’s what makes God’s grace so essential for us all.
Hi, this is Nate D. I saw your article pop up on my instagram feed and was curious what was your explanation of why Yahweh’s supposed actions in the Bible were not tyrannical. For the sake of argument, I will assume all these things actually happened. Your initial description of the Flood, the verses associated with it, and the interpretation of most fundamentalists in rationalizing the story seem spot on with what I have always encountered. It is basically, man sucks and God can do whatever he wants, or his justice requires that all sin be punished.
This takes us back though to the totality of the statement of man’s wickedness. Is it possible for the sum total of all man’s actions to be evil all the time? This includes not just the men, but the women, and children, the newborn babies, etc. Do you truly believe that everyone was that evil? More than that, if you believe in a literal hell with fire and brimstone, what amount of violence can a man commit over 120 years(Gen. 6:3) that would justify not just physical death, but eternal, unending torture as scripture states? Where is justice in that?
Later in the article you make a what if scenario in which God didn’t destroy the whole world with all the men, animals, bugs, trees, and everything, just because it was evil. Maybe it was because man was going to destroy himself and God knew it, so his motivation was really love. Do any verses ever refer to the flood as a event inspired by love? I know you appeal to other verses that God is love, but I don’t remember any verses that say the flood was because of anything other than God’s wrath and judgement. The first phrase that comes to my mind for this type of explanation is ad hoc. I have another friend who justifies the flood by saying angels copulated with females and corrupted the DNA so much that Noah and his family were the only pure humans. Any tale can be woven, but is there truth behind it? Does the rest of the Bible show God’s actions to always be loving and never vindictive or tyrannical? There is the story of the bears who devoured the children when they made fun of Elisha’s baldness in 2 Kings 2:24. There is the prophet that was lied to and stopped to eat at another prophet’s house on the way back from prophesying to Israel, so God had a lion kill him. There is the story of the man who touched the ark of the covenant to steady it on a cart on the way to Jerusalem who is instantly killed by God. There are the thousands that are killed by plague when David decides to take a census of the people. I could go on and on. God very clearly wants it his way, or he will kill you.
Your last appeal was to Jesus. Jesus is God and Jesus didn’t kill those who murdered him. I don’t know what you personally believe about prophecy, but most fundamentalist circles hold that Jesus will come back from heaven with a sword and destroy the wicked nations, after which there is eternal hell. (again, which is worse killing someone in a flood or torturing them forever?)
I was hoping for some good reasoning, but your last paragraph sums up your whole argument. “Since love is the very core of who God is (and that is certainly what Jesus demonstrated to us all), then everything God does must somehow be rooted in love.” i.e. I believe God/Jesus is love, so I just have faith. This is wishful thinking, and while I don’t know about grace, it is essential for resolving cognitive dissonance. Faith has never been a good reason for believing in anything. Faith is the same justification used for every other religion. Faith basically means I can’t explain or prove it, but just believe. If faith is really that trustworthy, I would like you to have faith that I am perfectly honest. I would like you also to believe that I have a magic bridge that can heal your sickness and your families, make you 10 lbs. lighter, and give you a million dollars a month. Have faith I love you and want you to be happy so for the low price of $99.99(just as a test that you really have faith) I will let you have it. Then when you pay me and can’t find the bridge where I told you, have faith that it was really there, and I loved you, but had to not give it to you because there was some love reason that I will never explain to you. Faith has no meaning beyond perpetuating beliefs that do not have evidence(or in this case,
that have direct biblical contradictions). But that’s just me.
You are welcome to your faith, but it doesn’t give any compelling reason to explain why God is not a vindictive tyrant. It just says, “Nuh uh! Because that contradicts my God that loves me.” But I am not depressed by this issue because I don’t believe the tyrannical monster exists or ever did as portrayed in the Bible. I guess the inerrancy of the bible another thing I don’t have faith in.
LikeLike
Hi Nate. I just got home from a trip, so I’m just now getting the chance to reply. Thank you very much for your comment. I appreciate that you read the article and commented on it. I hope you get the opportunity to read my future articles as some of your questions may be answered in upcoming ones. Obviously, whole books have been written on the topics I’m currently writing on, so all my thoughts will not be found on just the one article you read. They will be further developed in the weeks or months ahead. Anyway, thanks again and I wish you the best.
LikeLike